CARLOS TAPIA, wild and stone in the shoe OF Humala Tasso. The revisionism when it reaches its maximum power to influence the oppressed masses, then turns into reformism conciliator with the big bourgeoisie and supporter of the system. That's what happened with Carlos Tapia, that its mere presence in the cabinet of advisers Humala result makes animosity among the masses for the revisionist as any hardened to achieve a state without exploited or exploited is achieved through successive incremental changes and peaceful and within the bourgeois system, accommodating their needs and structure. But beware, a review must be very careful, because it is not serving the masses, if not quite the contrary, that serve their personal desires, his self-centeredness, because it is self-centered and if on the way endangered their interests, if you are with the masses of betrayal, but it is the bourgeois system, sprawls for more favors and is deserving keeper of his former friends on the road. In this not only have clear examples, one is the same Carlos Tapia, on the other and by the same route is rural Idrogo Rounds. The revisionist serves as a model for the big bourgeoisie.

The model serves to address the masses and to relate to their interests and tell the masses: It is a great democrat, a great humanist, and you should be. And so we put forth as a model, this not to exercise our rights to complain. But if we are on the contrary, all the bourgeois system will come to us not to try to crush his head up ever.